Competitive Comparisons
Kaumagraph Transfers compete well against many other popular technologies for textile printing.
Kaumagraph Transfers vs Pad Printing
Pros:
- No need to inventory plates
- No Messy Inks
- Fast and easy to change SKUs
- No need to maintain expensive pad printing equipment
- No worry about lint getting into the pad creating seconds
- No worry about ink drying on the plate creating seconds
- Pad printing has partial release problems when ink is too wet or too dry
- No need to worry about spiderwebbing from improper plate exposure
Cons:
- Transfers need to be shipped from manufacturer
Kaumagraph Transfers vs Screen Printing
Pros:
- Fast Application
- No Messy Inks
- Lower Cost in high volume production
- Better Stretch and Recovery
- Better Durability
- Softer Hand
Cons:
- Less Opacity with light inks on dark textiles
- Limited to 5 colours or less
Kaumagraph Transfers vs Adhesive Backed Transfers
Pros:
- Fast Application
- No Halo (glue residue around the image)
- Lower Cost in high volume production
- Better Stretch and Recovery
- Better Durability
- Softer Hand
Cons:
- Less Opacity with light inks on dark textiles
- Limited to 5 colours or less
- Very fine detail is easier to achieve with digitally printed adhesive based transfers